Social Connection After Relocation Statistics

Social Connection After Relocation Statistics 2027

Moving can change access to friends, family and practical support. This resource examines reported friendship experiences, personal support networks, recalled loneliness and the wider adjustment context around relocation.

What are the key relocation and social connection statistics?

What do relocation connection statistics measure?

MeasureMeaning
Local friendshipReported ease or difficulty making friends among local residents.
Personal support networkThe respondent’s perception of a network in the host country, not a verified network size.
Social satisfactionA rating of social life, distinct from contact frequency or loneliness.
LonelinessReported feelings in the source’s question; not a clinical diagnosis.
Adaptation contextCultural, family and workplace experiences surrounding a move.
Moving prioritiesMotivation or hypothetical choices, not outcomes after relocation.

How do expats experience friendship after relocation?

The 2026 InterNations survey distinguishes ease of making local friends from having a network and feeling satisfied socially. It includes expats with varied lengths of residence, so these figures are not a first-year adjustment curve. Destination results describe selected respondents, with exact selected counts unavailable.

What do expats report about friends and support?

Survey-wide figures are not global population estimates. These are different measures, not parts of one distribution.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F01 Making local friends is easy
Social experience
39%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents worldwide
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Mexico and Norway sections
F02 Making local friends is difficult
Social experience
40%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents worldwide
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Mexico and Norway sections
F03 Have a personal support network
Social experience
58%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents worldwide
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Mexico and Norway sections
F04 Happy with social life
Social experience
54%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents worldwide
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Mexico and Norway sections
Chart 1. Different positive measures, not parts of one distribution. Opt-in expats with mixed lengths of residence; exact item counts unknown. Original source [S01].

Where did selected respondents find local friendship easier?

Selected destination subsets, not national resident rates. Country differences may reflect who responded and their circumstances.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F05 Mexico
Social experience
73%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Mexico
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Mexico/Thailand; UK report: Finding Friends
F06 Thailand
Social experience
49%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Thailand
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Mexico/Thailand; UK report: Finding Friends
F07 United Kingdom
Social experience
33%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in United Kingdom
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Mexico/Thailand; UK report: Finding Friends

Where did respondents describe difficulty making local friends?

Norway very difficult is included in its difficult total. Do not add the two. Exact destination/item counts unavailable; selected countries are not a suitability ranking.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F08 Norway: difficult
Social experience
72%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Norway
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Norway/Sweden/Austria; UK report
F09 Norway: very difficult
Social experience
41%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Norway
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Norway/Sweden/Austria; UK report
F10 Sweden: difficult
Social experience
70%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Sweden
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Norway/Sweden/Austria; UK report
F11 Austria: difficult
Social experience
60%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Austria
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Norway/Sweden/Austria; UK report
F12 United Kingdom: difficult
Social experience
46%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in United Kingdom
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Norway/Sweden/Austria; UK report

Also Read:-

Grief And Support Network Statistics 2027

Social Anxiety And Making Friends Statistics 2027

Couples And Social Media Statistics 2027

Video Calling Family Connection Statistics 2027

AI Relationship Advice Statistics 2027

Do relocated expats have a support network?

Perceived personal support, social satisfaction and the composition of a friendship circle describe different things. A person can have a network mainly of other expats. These questions do not establish the number of close friends or the help available in a crisis.

How often did expats report a personal support network?

A perceived network is different from its size, depth or reliable help in a crisis. Selected country results share the same opt-in collection.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F13 Mexico
Social experience
73%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Mexico
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In country sections; Canada report: Finding Friends
F14 Panama
Social experience
72%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Panama
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In country sections; Canada report: Finding Friends
F15 Norway
Social experience
31%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Norway
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In country sections; Canada report: Finding Friends
F16 Sweden
Social experience
49%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Sweden
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In country sections; Canada report: Finding Friends
F17 Austria
Social experience
59%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Austria
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In country sections; Canada report: Finding Friends
F18 Canada
Social experience
48%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Canada
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In country sections; Canada report: Finding Friends
Chart 2. Country exact counts unknown. Survey-wide includes destination subsets; these are not national prevalence rates or a country suitability ranking. Original source [S01].

How satisfied were respondents with social life?

The Norway figure is unhappy, unlike the four happy ratings. It is not converted to a positive complement because neutral responses can exist.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F19 Mexico: happy
Social experience
75%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Mexico
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: named destination sections
F20 Panama: happy
Social experience
73%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Panama
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: named destination sections
F21 Thailand: happy
Social experience
67%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Thailand
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: named destination sections
F22 Sweden: happy
Social experience
25%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Sweden
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: named destination sections
F23 Norway: unhappy
Social experience
56%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Norway
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: named destination sections

Who makes up expats’ friendship circles?

Selected composition categories are not a complete distribution. Having expat friends does not imply poor-quality relationships or no local contact.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F24 Worldwide sample: mostly locals
Social experience
17%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents worldwide
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Mexico/Panama/Norway; UK report
F25 Mexico: mostly locals
Social experience
34%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Mexico
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Mexico/Panama/Norway; UK report
F26 United Kingdom: mostly locals
Social experience
21%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in the United Kingdom
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Mexico/Panama/Norway; UK report
F27 Worldwide sample: mostly other expats
Social experience
37%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents worldwide
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Mexico/Panama/Norway; UK report
F28 Panama: mostly other expats
Social experience
40%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Panama
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Mexico/Panama/Norway; UK report
F29 Norway: mostly other expats
Social experience
51%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Norway
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Ease of Settling In: Mexico/Panama/Norway; UK report

What do employer-paid movers report about loneliness?

The IMPACT Group report concerns company-paid relocations, including employees and spouses or partners. Participants recalled feelings before and after moving in one survey. The comparison documents reports in this selected sample; it does not establish that moving caused loneliness.

How did respondents recall loneliness before moving?

Retrospective ratings from the relocation survey. Displayed categories sum to 99%, leaving an unexplained remainder. Not a prospective baseline.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F31 Before: low
Social experience
74%IMPACT respondents in corporate-paid relocation study
September–November 2022
Exact selected n unavailable
S02
PDF p.7, Feelings of Loneliness graph
F32 Before: medium
Social experience
22%IMPACT respondents in corporate-paid relocation study
September–November 2022
Exact selected n unavailable
S02
PDF p.7, Feelings of Loneliness graph
F33 Before: high
Social experience
3%IMPACT respondents in corporate-paid relocation study
September–November 2022
Exact selected n unavailable
S02
PDF p.7, Feelings of Loneliness graph

How did respondents recall loneliness after moving?

Displayed categories sum to 98%, leaving an unexplained remainder. Differences cannot isolate a causal effect of moving or a national loneliness rate.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F34 After: low
Social experience
51%IMPACT respondents in corporate-paid relocation study
September–November 2022
Exact selected n unavailable
S02
PDF p.7, Feelings of Loneliness graph
F35 After: medium
Social experience
27%IMPACT respondents in corporate-paid relocation study
September–November 2022
Exact selected n unavailable
S02
PDF p.7, Feelings of Loneliness graph
F36 After: high
Social experience
20%IMPACT respondents in corporate-paid relocation study
September–November 2022
Exact selected n unavailable
S02
PDF p.7, Feelings of Loneliness graph
Chart 3. Corporate-paid moves; retrospective, not causal. Displayed categories sum to 99% before and 98% after; unexplained remainders not filled. Original source [S02].

What did people moving alone report?

Conditional, small solo-mover subgroup; exact selected count unknown. Do not apply this estimate to all people moving alone.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F37 Solo movers: medium/high loneliness
Social experience
67%IMPACT respondents in corporate-paid relocation study who moved alone
September–November 2022
Exact selected n unavailable
S02
PDF p.6, solo movers section

What wider adjustment challenges accompany a move?

Distance from family, settling-in assistance, cultural adaptation and convincing relatives to move provide context around social connection. These items are explicitly separated from friendship and support outcomes. Crown’s 2026-labelled report uses 2024 collection dates.

What worried Australia-bound respondents before moving?

Retrospective pre-move concern, not observed post-move isolation. This question does not measure whether family ties weakened.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F30 Worried about distance from home and family
Relocation context
42%InterNations 2026 opt-in expat respondents in Australia
February 1–March 31, 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S01
Australia 2026 report: concerns before moving

What wider adjustment challenges did respondents describe?

Different questions and potentially different eligible bases. Emotional adjustment is not identical to friendship formation; a duration is not a universal settling-in deadline.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F38 Would benefit from additional settling-in assistance
Relocation context
70%IMPACT respondents in corporate-paid relocation study
September–November 2022
Exact selected n unavailable
S02
PDF pp.4–7, support, duration, focus and disclosure sections
F39 Emotional/personal challenges lasted three months or longer
Relocation context
56%IMPACT respondents in corporate-paid relocation study
September–November 2022
Exact selected n unavailable
S02
PDF pp.4–7, support, duration, focus and disclosure sections
F40 Uncomfortable/very uncomfortable sharing challenges with manager/HR
Relocation context
41%IMPACT respondents in corporate-paid relocation study
September–November 2022
Exact selected n unavailable
S02
PDF pp.4–7, support, duration, focus and disclosure sections
F41 Emotional challenges significantly/very affected focus in new role
Relocation context
20%IMPACT respondents in corporate-paid relocation study who experienced emotional challenges during or after the move
September–November 2022
Exact selected n unavailable
S02
PDF p.9, Emotional Challenges & Their Effect on Work

What cultural barriers were reported?

2026-labelled report uses April–May 2024 fieldwork. Exact eligible routing for challenge questions is not supplied; selected barriers can overlap.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F42 Cultural adjustment was extremely/very challenging
Relocation context
65%Crown expat survey respondents in seven destinations
April–May 2024
Exact selected n unavailable
S03
PDF p.9, Cultural integration
F43 Language barriers among cultural challenges
Relocation context
39%Crown expat survey respondents in seven destinations
April–May 2024
Exact selected n unavailable
S03
PDF pp.10–11, cultural adjustment and Fig.2.3
F44 Adapting to new social norms among cultural challenges
Relocation context
29%Crown expat survey respondents in seven destinations
April–May 2024
Exact selected n unavailable
S03
PDF pp.10–11, cultural adjustment and Fig.2.3

How challenging was convincing family to relocate?

Not established as a parent-only percentage; exact eligible family/item count unknown. This is a decision-stage challenge, not a friendship outcome.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F45 Convincing family was extremely/very challenging
Relocation context
48%Crown expat survey respondents in seven destinations
April–May 2024
Exact selected n unavailable
S03
PDF p.12, family section

How do parents describe children’s adjustment?

Parents rated the adaptation of relocated school-aged children. These are proxy reports about a broad new environment, with no exact ages or selected count supplied. Adaptation can include many experiences besides making friends.

How did parents rate children’s adaptation?

Conditional on relocated school-aged children; exact selected count and ages unknown. Parent reports are not children’s own ratings or specific friendship measures. PDF categories retained; 86% refers to excitement, not this adaptation chart.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F46 Very well
Relocation context
61%Crown expat survey respondents in seven destinations reporting on relocated school-aged children
April–May 2024
Exact selected n unavailable
S03
PDF p.23, Fig.5.2
F47 Somewhat well
Relocation context
36%Crown expat survey respondents in seven destinations reporting on relocated school-aged children
April–May 2024
Exact selected n unavailable
S03
PDF p.23, Fig.5.2
F48 Not well
Relocation context
2%Crown expat survey respondents in seven destinations reporting on relocated school-aged children
April–May 2024
Exact selected n unavailable
S03
PDF p.23, Fig.5.2
F49 Still adapting
Relocation context
1%Crown expat survey respondents in seven destinations reporting on relocated school-aged children
April–May 2024
Exact selected n unavailable
S03
PDF p.23, Fig.5.2
Chart 4. Parents of relocated school-aged children; exact selected n unknown. Parent proxy ratings, not friendship-specific outcomes or children’s own reports. Original source [S03].

How do existing relationships shape relocation decisions?

Information sources and relationship priorities help explain why people consider a move or prepare for it. They are not evidence that a new friendship network formed afterward. The U.S. PODS job item is a hypothetical willingness, not an observed job refusal.

Which pre-move information sources were used?

Two selected categories from a broader distribution, not all sources. Getting information online does not establish building a support network.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F50 Online forums and social media
Relocation context
22%Crown expat survey respondents in seven destinations
April–May 2024
Exact selected n unavailable
S03
PDF p.15, Fig.3.1
F51 Friends/family who had relocated
Relocation context
17%Crown expat survey respondents in seven destinations
April–May 2024
Exact selected n unavailable
S03
PDF p.15, Fig.3.1

How do existing relationships influence U.S. moving decisions?

Recent U.S. movers in a commercial survey. Proximity influenced the move; turning down a job is hypothetical. Neither measures the social outcome after moving.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F52 Proximity to family, friends or support systems influenced move
Relocation context
41%PODS/HarrisQuestDIY U.S. respondents age 18–80 who moved within three years
March 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S04
Publisher release, relationship priorities and methodology
F53 Would turn down a higher-paying job to maintain relationships
Relocation context
45%PODS/HarrisQuestDIY U.S. respondents age 18–80 who moved within three years
March 2026
Exact selected n unavailable
S04
Publisher release, relationship priorities and methodology

What descriptive differences can be calculated?

These ten differences stay within a survey collection. Survey-wide benchmarks include destination subsets; before/after ratings are recalled; parent-rating categories are distinct responses. No statistical significance or causal effect is inferred.

IDComparisonDifferenceQualification
C01Local friendship easy: Mexico minus survey-wide34 percentage pointsSurvey aggregate includes country respondents; not independent populations.
C02Local friendship easy: Thailand minus survey-wide10 percentage pointsOpt-in subsets; no significance or country effect inferred.
C03Local friendship difficult: UK minus survey-wide6 percentage pointsCountry exact n unknown; same collection.
C04Support network: Mexico minus survey-wide15 percentage pointsGlobal benchmark is the survey aggregate, not world prevalence.
C05Support network: Panama minus survey-wide14 percentage pointsAggregate includes destination subsets.
C06Support network: Norway minus survey-wide-27 percentage pointsDescriptive negative gap; not evidence of country causation.
C07Happy with social life: Sweden minus survey-wide-29 percentage pointsSame positive response definition; opt-in subsets.
C08High loneliness: recalled after minus before17 percentage pointsRetrospective; categories have unexplained remainders; not causal.
C09Medium loneliness: recalled after minus before5 percentage pointsSame retrospective commercial survey; no controlled baseline.
C10Child adaptation: very well minus somewhat well25 percentage pointsParent-rated categories; not a time trend or child self-report.

Methodology and limitations

This compilation contains 53 observations in 16 related groups from four commercial survey collections: InterNations 30, IMPACT 11, Crown ten and PODS two. Thirty-six observations describe social experience; seventeen provide wider relocation context. Categories, destination subsets and recalled stages share samples. MyLittleDesire conducted no survey or pooled estimate.

Exact selected item or subgroup counts are unavailable for all 53 observations. Full survey counts are supplied separately: InterNations 7,786; IMPACT 101; Crown 1,000; PODS 1,000. These full counts must not be assigned to each row. The InterNations minimum of 50 per ranked destination is a threshold, not an exact country or question base.

InterNations uses an online voluntary expat sample with mixed lengths of residence. Its survey-wide benchmark is called a global average by the source, but it is not a representative estimate for the world population. Country subsets differ in composition and share the same collection. The survey does not isolate a causal effect of living in a particular country or establish where any individual should move.

The IMPACT publisher-authored 2023 report was inspected through a public PDF mirror. Its September–November 2022 survey covers corporate-paid moves and includes employees and spouses/partners. Recalled low, medium and high loneliness totals are 99% before and 98% after. The unexplained remainders are retained; categories are not normalized or filled. These are retrospective ratings, not a controlled prospective before-and-after study. The solo estimate has an unknown exact selected count and should be treated cautiously.

Crown’s report and release are labelled 2026, while PDF methods specify April–May 2024 collection. Its broad adjustment questions do not specifically measure close friendship. Child adaptation is reported by parents of school-aged children, with exact child ages and eligible parent count unavailable. The PDF adaptation chart gives 61% very well, 36% somewhat well, 2% not well and 1% still adapting. Its separate 86% excitement figure is not used as an adaptation percentage, despite the companion release’s settling wording.

PODS commissioned HarrisQuestDIY to survey U.S. adults aged 18–80 who had moved within three years. The March 2026 results concern relocation motives and hypothetical priorities. The inspected release does not supply recruitment, weighting, exact item counts or a full questionnaire. Motivation does not measure later relationship quality.

The newest documented fieldwork is March 2026. These sources do not supply a representative estimate of social connection among all domestic movers, a worldwide relocation-loneliness rate, a clinical diagnosis, or a universal timetable for making friends. Different populations, methods and questions prevent pooling. Descriptive percentage-point differences have no significance tests and are not effects.

Questions readers ask

How long does it take to make friends after moving?

These sources do not establish a universal time. Duration of emotional adjustment is a different measure from the time needed to form a close friendship.

Does relocation cause loneliness?

The selected surveys cannot establish that. Recalled differences and current ratings do not isolate the effect of moving from personal circumstances or other changes.

Are these percentages representative of all domestic movers?

No. Most social-outcome evidence here concerns opt-in expats or company-paid moves. The U.S. recent-mover source supplies relationship priorities, not a representative friendship-outcome estimate.

Does having mainly expat friends mean someone has no support?

No. Network composition and perceived support are different questions. The survey does not establish that one type of friendship is inherently better.

Related connection research

Explore our making friends as an adult statistics, neighbor relationships and community connection statistics, and loneliness statistics.

Original sources and methods

  1. InterNations [S01] — Expat Insider 2026: Ease of Settling In and destination reports
    Published: 2026 edition; exact release day not established. Fieldwork: February 1–March 31, 2026. Full sample n=7,786. Online voluntary survey promoted through expat communities and other channels; 162 nationalities; minimum 50 respondents per ranked destination. Full sample is not the selected item or country base. Exact selected counts unavailable. Global average means this survey, not the world population. Selected destination comparisons share one collection and cannot establish national prevalence or causal country effects. English questionnaire; no probability sampling claimed. Publisher/methods companion.
  2. IMPACT Group [S02] — 2023 People Perspective on Relocation
    Published: 2023 report edition. Fieldwork: September–November 2022. Full sample n=101. Commercial survey of 101 individuals; 60% employees and 40% spouses/partners; recruitment, weighting and exact selected bases not supplied. Publisher-authored PDF inspected through a public mirror. Before/after loneliness is recalled in one survey, not a prospective controlled experiment. Displayed low/medium/high categories sum to 99% before and 98% after; unexplained remainder retained. Solo subgroup is small and its exact eligible count is unknown. Publisher/methods companion.
  3. Crown World Mobility / Crown Relocations [S03] — Global Expat Survey Report 2026
    Published: 2026 report; companion release April 22, 2026. Fieldwork: April–May 2024. Full sample n=1,000. English-language email invitation and online survey; sampling frame, selection details, weighting, exact item/country counts and full routing not supplied in inspected report. 2026 is the report label, not collection year: methods specify 2024. Children adaptation is parent-reported; school-aged children, exact ages unavailable. PDF adaptation categories 61/36/2/1 retained. Its 86% is child excitement; companion release describes 86% settling smoothly, so that wording is excluded. Publisher/methods companion.
  4. PODS / HarrisQuestDIY [S04] — PODS Moving Mindset Study: Why Americans Are Moving
    Published: April 22, 2026. Fieldwork: March 2026. Full sample n=1,000. HarrisQuestDIY survey commissioned by PODS; recruitment, weights, selected item counts and full questionnaire not disclosed on release. Original publisher text retrieved through web search/open; direct local download returned 403. Proximity is a moving motivation; job refusal is hypothetical. Neither is an observed friendship outcome or a representative all-mover estimate. Publisher/methods companion.

Destination pages within S01: United Kingdom, Canada, Australia. These remain one collection.

How to cite this resource

MyLittleDesire. Social Connection After Relocation Statistics 2027. Proposed URL: https://mylittledesire.com/social-connection-after-relocation-statistics/. Use after publication; add access date.