Grief And Support Network Statistics

Grief And Support Network Statistics 2027

Grief support can come from family, friends, peers, communities and professional services. This resource examines who receives support, what people need, barriers to access, and preferences for help in schools and workplaces.

What are the key grief and support statistics?

What do grief support statistics measure?

MeasureInterpretation
BereavementThe experience of someone close having died; not itself a diagnosis.
GriefResponses to loss; people’s experiences and support needs vary.
Support useReported receipt or use of a particular source, with the source’s timeframe.
HelpfulnessA user’s retrospective rating, distinct from measured clinical improvement.
Unmet support needA source-specific classification of insufficient or absent desired help.
Institutional attitudesWhat parents or employees say they want, not provision verified by researchers.
Prolonged grief disorderA clinical condition involving persistent, intense grief and functional impairment; high support needs alone do not establish it.

Definition context: American Psychiatric Association. No diagnostic prevalence estimate from that page is counted in the dataset.

Where did bereaved respondents turn for support?

Family, friends, peers and professionals can form different parts of a support network. These studies ask different groups about different time windows, so their source-use rates are shown separately. Using several sources does not measure the quality of every relationship.

Which supports did the Australian respondents use?

Multiple support sources could be used. These pandemic-era sample rates are not Australian population prevalence or evidence of treatment effectiveness.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F01 Family and friends
Bereavement experience
85.1%Australian bereaved adult convenience-sample respondents
April 2021–April 2022; deaths January 2020–February 2022
Selected base n=1,878; Published Table 2 total-sample base
S01
Table 2, total sample column
F02 Self-help resources
Bereavement experience
27.2%Australian bereaved adult convenience-sample respondents
April 2021–April 2022; deaths January 2020–February 2022
Selected base n=1,878; Published Table 2 total-sample base
S01
Table 2, total sample column
F03 General practitioner
Bereavement experience
21.5%Australian bereaved adult convenience-sample respondents
April 2021–April 2022; deaths January 2020–February 2022
Selected base n=1,878; Published Table 2 total-sample base
S01
Table 2, total sample column
F04 Psychologist
Bereavement experience
19.6%Australian bereaved adult convenience-sample respondents
April 2021–April 2022; deaths January 2020–February 2022
Selected base n=1,878; Published Table 2 total-sample base
S01
Table 2, total sample column
F05 Online community support groups
Bereavement experience
17.6%Australian bereaved adult convenience-sample respondents
April 2021–April 2022; deaths January 2020–February 2022
Selected base n=1,878; Published Table 2 total-sample base
S01
Table 2, total sample column
F06 Grief counselling
Bereavement experience
10.9%Australian bereaved adult convenience-sample respondents
April 2021–April 2022; deaths January 2020–February 2022
Selected base n=1,878; Published Table 2 total-sample base
S01
Table 2, total sample column
F07 Religious leaders/organizations
Bereavement experience
8.4%Australian bereaved adult convenience-sample respondents
April 2021–April 2022; deaths January 2020–February 2022
Selected base n=1,878; Published Table 2 total-sample base
S01
Table 2, total sample column
F08 Advice or support line
Bereavement experience
3.5%Australian bereaved adult convenience-sample respondents
April 2021–April 2022; deaths January 2020–February 2022
Selected base n=1,878; Published Table 2 total-sample base
S01
Table 2, total sample column
F09 Informal bereavement support groups
Bereavement experience
3%Australian bereaved adult convenience-sample respondents
April 2021–April 2022; deaths January 2020–February 2022
Selected base n=1,878; Published Table 2 total-sample base
S01
Table 2, total sample column
F10 Formal grief support groups
Bereavement experience
2.2%Australian bereaved adult convenience-sample respondents
April 2021–April 2022; deaths January 2020–February 2022
Selected base n=1,878; Published Table 2 total-sample base
S01
Table 2, total sample column
Chart 1. Five selected sources, multiple answers possible. Pandemic-era voluntary sample, 94.9% women; not population prevalence. Original source [S01].

Which support sources did Ontario recipients use?

Only recipients of any support, not all Ontario adults or all bereaved respondents. Sources overlap. Published clergy rate 26.2% retained despite a small count/rate rounding inconsistency.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F15 Family members
Bereavement experience
88.7%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample who received any support
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=586; Published Table 5 recipient base
S02
Table 5, Yes column
F16 Friends
Bereavement experience
86%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample who received any support
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=586; Published Table 5 recipient base
S02
Table 5, Yes column
F17 Local community members
Bereavement experience
37.7%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample who received any support
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=586; Published Table 5 recipient base
S02
Table 5, Yes column
F18 Family doctor
Bereavement experience
39.2%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample who received any support
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=586; Published Table 5 recipient base
S02
Table 5, Yes column
F19 Grief counsellor
Bereavement experience
30.9%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample who received any support
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=586; Published Table 5 recipient base
S02
Table 5, Yes column
F20 Bereavement support services
Bereavement experience
26.6%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample who received any support
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=586; Published Table 5 recipient base
S02
Table 5, Yes column
F21 Other bereaved people
Bereavement experience
48.6%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample who received any support
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=586; Published Table 5 recipient base
S02
Table 5, Yes column
F22 Clergy
Bereavement experience
26.2%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample who received any support
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=586; Published Table 5 recipient base
S02
Table 5, Yes column

How much did cohort respondents use family and friends?

T1 asks since loss; T4 asks about the past six months. T4 valid n=170, not the full final-wave n=185. No direct trend or effect of time is inferred.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F41 Baseline: since loss
Bereavement experience
87.3%UK cohort baseline respondents
August 28, 2020–January 5, 2021 (T1)
Selected base n=711; Published Table 4 baseline reporting base
S03
Table 4, family and friends row; Results §3.3 and footnotes
F42 Final wave: past six months
Bereavement experience
90%UK cohort final-wave valid respondents to family/friend item
May 17, 2022–January 12, 2023 (T4)
Selected base n=170; Published numerator/base 153/170 in Results §3.3
S03
Table 4, family and friends row; Results §3.3 and footnotes

How helpful did users find their support?

The Ontario study asks users whether each source was helpful. Its denominators change with the source used. Retrospective satisfaction cannot establish that one provider is more effective than another, and it does not measure how many people recovered.

How helpful did users find each source?

Each percentage has a different user denominator. These are retrospective ratings, not randomized comparisons, clinical success rates or the share of all bereaved people helped.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F23 Family members
Bereavement experience
86.2%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample who used family members
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=520; Published source-user count in Table 5
S02
Table 5, Found it helpful column; user counts in Yes column
F24 Friends
Bereavement experience
86.3%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample who used friends
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=504; Published source-user count in Table 5
S02
Table 5, Found it helpful column; user counts in Yes column
F25 Local community members
Bereavement experience
78.3%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample who used local community members
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=221; Published source-user count in Table 5
S02
Table 5, Found it helpful column; user counts in Yes column
F26 Family doctor
Bereavement experience
75.7%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample who used family doctor
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=230; Published source-user count in Table 5
S02
Table 5, Found it helpful column; user counts in Yes column
F27 Other bereaved people
Bereavement experience
84.6%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample who used other bereaved people
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=285; Published source-user count in Table 5
S02
Table 5, Found it helpful column; user counts in Yes column
F28 Clergy
Bereavement experience
81.2%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample who used clergy
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=154; Published source-user count in Table 5
S02
Table 5, Found it helpful column; user counts in Yes column
Chart 2. Each bar uses users of that source: family n=520, friends 504, community 221, doctor 230, bereaved peers 285, clergy 154. Not a treatment comparison. Original source [S02].

What emotional and practical support needs were reported?

Needs can involve being understood, reassurance, social connection or practical help. High needs are not diagnoses. The UK cohort has fewer respondents at later waves; separate wave estimates do not describe a universal recovery trajectory.

How common were unmet needs in that Australian sample?

Unmet means some but insufficient support OR no needed support. The comparison category includes people who did not feel they needed support. Body/Table 2 62.0% is distinct from abstract wording about 66% specific unmet needs.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F11 Some unmet support needs
Bereavement experience
62%Australian bereaved adult convenience-sample respondents
April 2021–April 2022; deaths January 2020–February 2022
Selected base n=1,878; Published overall valid sample; 1,164 classified as unmet
S01
Results, Characteristics of the sample; Table 2 column totals

What high support needs were reported around five months after loss?

Selected convenience cohort, not all UK bereaved adults. Need is not a diagnosis. Item-valid n is derived from response counts/published missing. Attrition means these wave distributions are not a matched recovery curve.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F29 Feelings about how the person died
Bereavement experience
59.8%UK bereavement cohort baseline respondents, median five months after loss
August 28, 2020–January 5, 2021 (T1)
Selected base n=697; Table-derived valid n: wave total minus published item missing
S03
Table 3, fairly high/high response row, T1 column
F30 Expressing feelings and being understood
Bereavement experience
53%UK bereavement cohort baseline respondents, median five months after loss
August 28, 2020–January 5, 2021 (T1)
Selected base n=694; Table-derived valid n: wave total minus published item missing
S03
Table 3, fairly high/high response row, T1 column
F31 Feeling comforted and reassured
Bereavement experience
51.7%UK bereavement cohort baseline respondents, median five months after loss
August 28, 2020–January 5, 2021 (T1)
Selected base n=686; Table-derived valid n: wave total minus published item missing
S03
Table 3, fairly high/high response row, T1 column
F32 Feelings of anxiety and depression
Bereavement experience
52.8%UK bereavement cohort baseline respondents, median five months after loss
August 28, 2020–January 5, 2021 (T1)
Selected base n=691; Table-derived valid n: wave total minus published item missing
S03
Table 3, fairly high/high response row, T1 column
F33 Loneliness and social isolation
Bereavement experience
52%UK bereavement cohort baseline respondents, median five months after loss
August 28, 2020–January 5, 2021 (T1)
Selected base n=691; Table-derived valid n: wave total minus published item missing
S03
Table 3, fairly high/high response row, T1 column
F34 Regaining purpose and meaning
Bereavement experience
46.7%UK bereavement cohort baseline respondents, median five months after loss
August 28, 2020–January 5, 2021 (T1)
Selected base n=691; Table-derived valid n: wave total minus published item missing
S03
Table 3, fairly high/high response row, T1 column
Chart 3. Fairly high/high need at baseline, median five months after loss. Different overlapping needs, not disorder prevalence or a recovery deadline. Original source [S03].

What high support needs remained among final-wave respondents?

Selected convenience cohort, not all UK bereaved adults. Need is not a diagnosis. Item-valid n is derived from response counts/published missing. Attrition means these wave distributions are not a matched recovery curve.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F35 Feelings about how the person died
Bereavement experience
18.5%UK bereavement cohort final-wave respondents, median 25 months after loss
May 17, 2022–January 12, 2023 (T4)
Selected base n=184; Table-derived valid n: wave total minus published item missing
S03
Table 3, fairly high/high response row, T4 column
F36 Expressing feelings and being understood
Bereavement experience
15.8%UK bereavement cohort final-wave respondents, median 25 months after loss
May 17, 2022–January 12, 2023 (T4)
Selected base n=183; Table-derived valid n: wave total minus published item missing
S03
Table 3, fairly high/high response row, T4 column
F37 Feeling comforted and reassured
Bereavement experience
15.3%UK bereavement cohort final-wave respondents, median 25 months after loss
May 17, 2022–January 12, 2023 (T4)
Selected base n=183; Table-derived valid n: wave total minus published item missing
S03
Table 3, fairly high/high response row, T4 column
F38 Feelings of anxiety and depression
Bereavement experience
17.9%UK bereavement cohort final-wave respondents, median 25 months after loss
May 17, 2022–January 12, 2023 (T4)
Selected base n=184; Table-derived valid n: wave total minus published item missing
S03
Table 3, fairly high/high response row, T4 column
F39 Loneliness and social isolation
Bereavement experience
14.4%UK bereavement cohort final-wave respondents, median 25 months after loss
May 17, 2022–January 12, 2023 (T4)
Selected base n=181; Table-derived valid n: wave total minus published item missing
S03
Table 3, fairly high/high response row, T4 column
F40 Regaining purpose and meaning
Bereavement experience
15.2%UK bereavement cohort final-wave respondents, median 25 months after loss
May 17, 2022–January 12, 2023 (T4)
Selected base n=184; Table-derived valid n: wave total minus published item missing
S03
Table 3, fairly high/high response row, T4 column

What gaps and barriers affected access?

Not wanting support, not finding it, not receiving it and not finding it helpful are different experiences. The UK consultation and Ontario study use selected populations and conditional questions. Percentages are not pooled into one unmet-need rate.

Who wanted and received bereavement support in Ontario?

Different denominators. Receiving support without reporting that it was wanted does not establish coercion, unwanted contact or harmful care.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F12 Wanted support
Bereavement experience
38.9%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=1,169; Published wanting-support analysis base
S02
Results, wanting support and wanting/receiving support sections
F13 Received any support
Bereavement experience
50.1%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Exact selected n unavailable
S02
Results, wanting support and wanting/receiving support sections
F14 Recipients who had not wanted support
Bereavement experience
42.5%English-completing bereaved Ontario adults in quota-panel sample who received support
Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number
Selected base n=586; Published support-recipient base; 249 had not wanted support
S02
Results, wanting support and wanting/receiving support sections

What informal-support gaps did the UK consultation identify?

Voluntary consultation respondents, not UK national prevalence. The original item asks about help coping, not all social contact. Source nonreceipt categories overlap; do not add them.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F53 No family support
Bereavement experience
28%Adult UK bereavement consultation respondents
Adult online consultation September 2021–January 2022; adults bereaved within previous five years
Selected base n=1,119; Published informal-support question/chart base
S05
Full report PDF p.29, informal-support prose/chart base
F54 No friend support
Bereavement experience
46%Adult UK bereavement consultation respondents
Adult online consultation September 2021–January 2022; adults bereaved within previous five years
Selected base n=1,119; Published informal-support question/chart base
S05
Full report PDF p.29, informal-support prose/chart base
F55 No support from any informal source
Bereavement experience
17.8%Adult UK bereavement consultation respondents
Adult online consultation September 2021–January 2022; adults bereaved within previous five years
Selected base n=1,119; Published informal-support question/chart base
S05
Full report PDF p.29, informal-support prose/chart base

Did people wanting formal support receive it?

Conditional on wanting formal support. Exact eligible n is not specified beside the 42% passage. The adjacent barrier-chart n=281 is not automatically assigned here.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F56 Wanted formal support but received none
Bereavement experience
42%Adult consultation respondents wanting formal bereavement support
Adult online consultation September 2021–January 2022; adults bereaved within previous five years
Exact selected n unavailable
S05
Full report PDF p.129, barriers section opening paragraph

Also Read:-

Social Anxiety And Making Friends Statistics 2027

Couples And Social Media Statistics 2027

Video Calling Family Connection Statistics 2027

AI Relationship Advice Statistics 2027

AI Romantic Partners Statistics 2027

What barriers were reported by people wanting support?

Conditional multiple-response barrier item n=281. Includes people certain they wanted support and those thinking they might benefit but uncertain. Not an all-bereaved or national service-failure rate.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F57 Did not know what was available or how to access it
Bereavement experience
37%Adult UK consultation respondents in support-barrier item
Adult online consultation September 2021–January 2022; adults bereaved within previous five years
Selected base n=281; Published barrier-chart base
S05
Full report PDF p.129, original barrier chart (visually checked)
F58 Needed support was not available
Bereavement experience
33%Adult UK consultation respondents in support-barrier item
Adult online consultation September 2021–January 2022; adults bereaved within previous five years
Selected base n=281; Published barrier-chart base
S05
Full report PDF p.129, original barrier chart (visually checked)
F59 Did not feel comfortable asking for help
Bereavement experience
26%Adult UK consultation respondents in support-barrier item
Adult online consultation September 2021–January 2022; adults bereaved within previous five years
Selected base n=281; Published barrier-chart base
S05
Full report PDF p.129, original barrier chart (visually checked)
F60 Did not believe support would help
Bereavement experience
20%Adult UK consultation respondents in support-barrier item
Adult online consultation September 2021–January 2022; adults bereaved within previous five years
Selected base n=281; Published barrier-chart base
S05
Full report PDF p.129, original barrier chart (visually checked)
Chart 4. Four selected multiple-response barriers, not all UK bereaved adults. The separate 42% nonreceipt estimate has an unspecified exact base. Original source [S05].

What do parents and employees want from institutions?

These U.S. items ask parents and employed adults about support in schools and workplaces. Most are attitudes or preferences, not reports from a bereaved-only sample or measurements of services actually delivered.

What support do U.S. parents want around children’s grief?

Survey parents, not necessarily recently bereaved parents. Exact parent/item counts and full routing unknown. Attitudes do not measure what children actually receive.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F43 Youngest grievers need special support
Institutional context
95%U.S. parents in New York Life 2025 survey
September 16–21, 2025
Exact selected n unavailable
S04
PDF p.4 / printed pp.6–7; PDF p.6 / printed pp.10–11
F44 Want resources to discuss grief with young children
Institutional context
89%U.S. parents in New York Life 2025 survey
September 16–21, 2025
Exact selected n unavailable
S04
PDF p.4 / printed pp.6–7; PDF p.6 / printed pp.10–11
F45 Under-fives are often forgotten grievers
Institutional context
86%U.S. parents in New York Life 2025 survey
September 16–21, 2025
Exact selected n unavailable
S04
PDF p.4 / printed pp.6–7; PDF p.6 / printed pp.10–11
F46 Educators should help support grieving children
Institutional context
87%U.S. parents in New York Life 2025 survey
September 16–21, 2025
Exact selected n unavailable
S04
PDF p.4 / printed pp.6–7; PDF p.6 / printed pp.10–11
F47 Support grief education in school curricula
Institutional context
83%U.S. parents in New York Life 2025 survey
September 16–21, 2025
Exact selected n unavailable
S04
PDF p.4 / printed pp.6–7; PDF p.6 / printed pp.10–11
F48 Believe grief education should begin in elementary school
Institutional context
42%U.S. parents in New York Life 2025 survey
September 16–21, 2025
Exact selected n unavailable
S04
PDF p.4 / printed pp.6–7; PDF p.6 / printed pp.10–11

How do employed adults view bereavement support?

Employed survey adults, not exclusively bereaved employees. Three are attitudes and one is an ever-experience. PDF gives 66% bereaved while working; companion release gives 61%. PDF retained. Exact item/subgroup counts unavailable.

Finding / scopePercentPopulation, period and baseOriginal source
F49 Death of a loved one is as significant as other major life events
Institutional context
91%U.S. employed adults in New York Life 2025 survey
September 16–21, 2025
Exact selected n unavailable
S04
PDF p.9 / printed pp.16–17; p.10 / printed pp.18–19
F50 Experienced a loved one’s death while employed
Institutional context
66%U.S. employed adults in New York Life 2025 survey
September 16–21, 2025
Exact selected n unavailable
S04
PDF p.9 / printed pp.16–17; p.10 / printed pp.18–19
F51 Bereavement policy important when job hunting
Institutional context
77%U.S. employed adults in New York Life 2025 survey
September 16–21, 2025
Exact selected n unavailable
S04
PDF p.9 / printed pp.16–17; p.10 / printed pp.18–19
F52 Proud to work for a bereavement-supportive company
Institutional context
93%U.S. employed adults in New York Life 2025 survey
September 16–21, 2025
Exact selected n unavailable
S04
PDF p.9 / printed pp.16–17; p.10 / printed pp.18–19

What descriptive differences can be calculated?

Ten reproducible percentage-point differences are available in the workbook. They stay within a dataset and retain question/base distinctions. They do not establish statistical significance, causation or treatment effects.

IDComparisonDifference
C01Family/friends minus self-help use: Australia57.9 percentage points
C02GP minus psychologist use: Australia1.9 percentage points
C03Online groups minus grief counselling use: Australia6.7 percentage points
C04Family minus friend support use: Ontario recipients2.7 percentage points
C05Other bereaved people minus family doctor use: Ontario9.4 percentage points
C06Understanding minus comfort: UK baseline high needs1.3 percentage points
C07Anxiety/depression minus loneliness: UK baseline high needs0.8 percentage points
C08Employer pride minus job-search importance16 percentage points
C09No friend minus no family support: consultation18 percentage points
C10Awareness barrier minus unavailable support4 percentage points

Methodology and limitations

This resource selects 60 observations: Australia 11, Ontario 17, UK cohort 14, New York Life 10 and UK consultation eight. Related support sources, categories and follow-up stages share samples. Fifty observations describe bereavement experiences; ten give wider institutional context from parent/employee samples. A separate APA page supplies definition context only. MyLittleDesire conducted no survey, pooled analysis or clinical assessment.

Forty-eight selected reporting bases are available, including twelve valid UK need-item bases derived from response counts or published missing values. Twelve exact item/subgroup counts remain unknown. Full sample sizes remain separate. Ontario received-any-support valid n is not separately established. New York Life parent and employee counts are not supplied. The UK consultation’s exact full adult count is not established here; its age table has 1,121 valid responses, support item 1,119 and barrier chart 281.

The Australian study uses a convenience sample of 1,878, overwhelmingly women. It classifies 1,164 people as having unmet needs, or 62.0%. The abstract’s 66% refers to specific unmet needs; this resource retains the Results/Table 2 overall classification and does not silently substitute the abstract figure. Respondents could select several support sources. These pandemic-era experiences cannot establish contemporary national unmet need.

The Ontario study uses non-probability quotas in an English-completing panel. Its publication date, December 2025, is not its undisclosed field date. Source use is among 586 support recipients; helpfulness is among users of each source. The clergy-use percentage of 26.2% is retained as published, although its stated count of 154 out of 586 rounds to 26.3%. More distress among people seeking multiple supports does not show that those supports caused distress.

The UK convenience cohort falls from 711 baseline respondents to 185 final-wave respondents. The selected need percentages exclude item missingness, so bases vary. At T1, needs are reported around five months after death; at T4, around 25 months. The tables describe wave-specific distributions, not matched individual change. Family/friend use also changes reference window from since loss to the last six months, with final-wave valid n=170. No recovery deadline or national trend is inferred.

The New York Life 2025 poll was released in March 2026. Its original PDF gives 66% for employed adults experiencing a loved one’s death while working; the companion release gives 61%. This resource uses the original PDF 66% and records the discrepancy. Its school-record item shifts between adults and parents in the report, so that item is excluded. Survey attitudes do not prove actual institutional provision or the impact of a policy.

The UK Commission consultation is voluntary and retrospective. The support question asks about help with coping, which differs from all social contact. Barriers are multiple response among a selected n=281. The separate 42% figure is conditional on wanting formal support, with an unspecified exact eligible count. That count is left unknown. Lack-of-support categories overlap and cannot be added into a combined rate.

These designs cannot isolate whether support causes better or worse grief outcomes. Countries, sampling, definitions and timeframes differ, so no cross-country ranking or pooled worldwide rate is produced. Support needs are not diagnostic criteria. The selected figures do not establish how many people have prolonged grief disorder or which treatment works best.

Questions readers ask

Does everyone who grieves need professional treatment?

These surveys do not establish that. They describe varied needs and sources, including personal networks, practical help and professional services. Need for support and a clinical diagnosis are separate.

Does a helpfulness percentage mean a treatment works?

No. The Ontario ratings come from users looking back on support. There was no randomized treatment comparison, and different source users may have different needs.

Can the UK follow-up percentages show when people recover?

No. Attrition, item missingness and different respondents across waves prevent treating these tables as a universal recovery schedule.

Does 42% without wanted formal support use n=281?

The inspected passage does not confirm that. The barrier chart uses 281, while the exact eligible base for the separate 42% remains unknown.

Related connection research

See our social support during life changes statistics, sympathy-card and condolence practices statistics, and loneliness statistics for related measures.

Original sources

  1. Ivynian et al. / PLOS ONE [S01] — Support needs of Australians bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey study
    Published: June 6, 2024. Fieldwork: April 2021–April 2022; deaths January 2020–February 2022. Full survey/starting analytic sample n=1,878. Voluntary online survey advertised through social media and community/consumer organizations; cross-sectional, not a probability sample. Sample 94.9% women. Valid cases answered the overall support-needs question. Results/Table 2 identify 1,164 unmet needs out of 1,878 (62.0%). Abstract says 66% reported specific unmet needs; that wording/number is not substituted for the overall classification. Support sources overlap; receiving support is not evidence of treatment benefit. Supporting original source.
  2. Redican et al. / Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology [S02] — Bereavement and mental health factors associated with seeking and receiving support following loss among Canadian bereaved adults
    Published: Online December 2, 2025; journal issue 2026. Fieldwork: Exact fieldwork dates not reported in inspected article; not inferred from publication or ethics number. Full survey/starting analytic sample n=1,170. Qualtrics managed double opt-in panels; non-probability quotas on age, gender and income; bereaved analytic subset of 1,310 adults. Wanting-support analysis n=1,169; support recipients n=586. Source-use rates use recipients; helpfulness rates use only users of each specific source. The received-any-support item-valid n is not separately established. Table 5 clergy use 26.2% is retained although 154/586 rounds to 26.3%. Higher distress among people using more support does not prove support harms them. Supporting original source.
  3. Goss et al. / Frontiers in Public Health [S03] — Support needs, support use and perceived helpfulness of support in a cohort of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Published: June 24, 2026. Fieldwork: Baseline August 28, 2020–January 5, 2021; final wave May 17, 2022–January 12, 2023. Full survey/starting analytic sample n=711. Convenience-sample longitudinal web survey; wave totals 711, 384, 295 and 185; no population weighting claimed. 89% women at baseline; attrition and selection limit generalization. Support-need bases below are derived from response counts or wave total minus published missing. T1 median five months after loss, T4 median 25 months. Family/friend use T1 is since loss; T4 is past six months, with item n=170 rather than wave n=185. These are not directly comparable national trends. Supporting original source.
  4. New York Life Foundation [S04] — 2025 State of Grief Report: Building a Sustainable Culture of Care and Grief Support
    Published: 2025 report edition; release March 12, 2026. Fieldwork: September 16–21, 2025. Full survey/starting analytic sample n=2,201. Online poll weighted to demographic targets; detailed recruitment, selected subgroup counts and full questionnaire not supplied in report. Parent and employed-adult counts remain unknown. Preferences do not measure actual school/workplace provision or clinical efficacy. Original PDF p.9 / printed pp.16–17 gives 66% of employed adults bereaved while working; companion release gives 61%. This compilation uses the PDF 66% and records the discrepancy. The school-record item has ambiguous adults/parents wording and is excluded. Supporting original source.
  5. UK Commission on Bereavement / Marie Curie [S05] — Bereavement is everyone’s business — full report
    Published: October 6, 2022. Fieldwork: Adult online consultation September 2021–January 2022; adults bereaved within previous five years. Exact full adult count not established. Open consultation combining adult/child surveys and organizational/oral evidence; selected adult support base 1,119, barrier-chart base 281. Exact full adult count not established from summary; age table has 1,121 valid responses. Do not treat 1,119 as every question’s full sample. No-family/no-friend figures refer to reported support helping cope, not absence of all contact. Barriers are multiple response among people wanting support. The 42% unmet formal-support passage has an unspecified exact eligible base; do not automatically assign the barrier-chart n=281. Supporting original source.

Definition reference, not a survey collection: American Psychiatric Association: Prolonged Grief Disorder.

How to cite this resource

MyLittleDesire. Grief & Support Network Statistics 2027. Proposed URL: https://mylittledesire.com/grief-support-network-statistics/. Use after publication and add your access date.